Development Oversight
A company outsources significant software development — a platform build, modernization, AI initiative — and has no independent technical oversight on what the vendor is proposing or delivering. Nobody on the client side can tell if the build is on track.
Phase 1 — Evaluate Before Signing
Before committing: independent assessment of vendor proposals to separate feasible from fantasy, or a structured comparison across competing proposals.
Technical Delivery Assurance
Module A2 — Proposal Technical Assessment
Independent per-proposal review covering architecture fit, feasibility, team composition, timeline realism, and red flags. Produces a shortlist recommendation so you can distinguish technically feasible proposals from template responses.
- Proposal Technical Assessment (per-proposal)
- Shortlist Recommendation
After: Vendor proposals assessed against real architecture. Feasible offers separated from template responses. Contract risks surfaced before signing.
Phase 2 — Oversee the Build
During delivery: independent sprint-level oversight that verifies the vendor is building what was agreed, at the quality promised, conforming to the architecture specified. Code quality checks, architecture conformance reviews, and blocker legitimacy assessment.
Technical Delivery Assurance
Module A3 — Delivery Health Diagnostic
Current-state assessment of an active vendor engagement: what has been built, architecture soundness, blocker legitimacy, realistic timeline, and root cause analysis. Independently verifies whether vendor-reported problems are real or excuses.
- Delivery Health Diagnostic Report
- Root Cause Analysis
- Realistic Timeline Assessment
After: Per-sprint code quality and architecture conformance review. Vendor progress verified against what was agreed. Blocker legitimacy independently assessed.
Phase 3 — Accept with Confidence
OptionalAt delivery milestones and final handover: independent technical verification that what was delivered meets the specification, quality standards, and production-readiness criteria before formal acceptance.
Technical Delivery Assurance
Module A5 — Technical Acceptance
Production readiness assessment covering code quality, architecture conformance, requirements verification, and operational readiness. Delivers a pass/fail/conditional verdict before you sign off on vendor-delivered work.
- Technical Acceptance Report
- Pass/Fail/Conditional Verdict
- Operational Readiness Checklist
After: Independent technical acceptance assessment. Deliverables verified against specification and quality criteria before sign-off.
Outcome
Vendor proposals evaluated, delivery verified, quality assured.
Related Journeys
First AI Build
A company needs its first AI use case in production — not a strategy deck, a working capability. There is no internal AI team, no data science function, and no prior AI initiative to build on. Every vendor wants to sell a 12-month programme. The pressure is to show proof of value before committing at that scale.
View journeyProject Rescue
An AI initiative is behind schedule, over budget, or stuck in pilot — and nobody internally has the independence or the mandate to say whether it should be fixed, restructured, or killed.
View journeySecond Opinion
A significant architecture decision or investment is on the table — new AI platform, vendor selection, build-vs-buy — and leadership wants independent validation before committing budget.
View journeyReady to start the Development Oversight journey?
Book a 30-minute discovery call. We will listen to your situation and confirm the right starting point — no commitment required.